Johnson v. Craften et al
| Jeffrey Johnson |
| Max Parish, Jr, Calloway County Sheriff's Department, Bill Markem, Holly Green RV Park, Doug Craften, Burl's Wrecker Service and Arvin Craften |
| 5:2013cv00087 |
| June 6, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Paducah Office |
| Calloway |
| Thomas B. Russell |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 11/18/2014; re 63 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Max Parish, Jr,, Burl's Wrecker Service, 58 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Arvin Craften, 54 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Bill Markem ; a separate order shall issuecc:counsel (KJA)
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell; on initial review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A the action is dismissed in part and allowed to continue in part. The claims against Defs Doug Craften, Holly Green RV Park and the Calloway County Sheriff's Department are dismissed pursuant to 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim; Scheduling Order will be entered to govern development of remaining claims; Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate Doug Craften, HollyGreen RV Park and the Calloway County Sheriff's Department as parties to this action. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendants; Calloway County Attorney (SG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
