Lyles et al v. RDP Company et al
| Pat N. Lyles, Janice S. Cope, Charles Story and Cindy Story |
| RDP Company, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Lafarge West, Inc. |
| 5:2014cv00021 |
| February 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Paducah Office |
| Caldwell |
| Thomas B. Russell |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
MEMORANDUM OPINION; signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 8/1/16: finding as moot 73 Motion to Strike, 75 Motion to Strike, and 80 Motion for Extension of Time to File, granting 77 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 78 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 79 Motion for Summary Judgment;[; granting 81 Motion for Summary Judgment. An appropriate order shall issue separate from this Memorandum Opinion cc: Counsel(DJT)
|
|
Filing
51
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 37 Motion to Bifurcate; Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 6/11/15: The issue of damages relating to the claims made in the third-party complaint shall be bifurcated and the action stayed with respect to those issues. The issues with respect to liability relating to the claims made in the third-party complaint shall not be bifurcated or stayed. cc: Counsel (DJT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
