White v. Douglas Autotech Corporation

Plaintiff: Stacey White
Defendant: Douglas Autotech Corporation
Case Number: 5:2015cv00256
Filed: December 22, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Office: Paducah Office
County: Christian
Presiding Judge: Lanny King
Presiding Judge: Greg N. Stivers
Nature of Suit: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2016 Filing 21 OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 7/26/2016; re DN 19 parties have leave to file a revised agreed protective order, consistent with this Opinion and Order within 30 days of entry of this Opinion and Order.cc:counsel (KJA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: White v. Douglas Autotech Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacey White
Represented By: Kenneth R. Haggard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas Autotech Corporation
Represented By: John T. Lovett
Represented By: Carrie B. Pond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?