Smith v. Davis et al
| Rodney Smith |
| Charles Aaron Davis, James Beeler, Troy Belt, Wesley Burnett, Lauren Epley, Brittany Fraliex, Monica McCullough, Joy Meyers, Benjamin Mitchell, Seth T. Mitchell, Brian Neely, Marshall E. Peck, Charles Roberts, Gage Rodriguez and Randy White |
| 5:2017cv00187 |
| November 29, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Paducah Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Greg N. Stivers |
| Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 1/8/2020. Granting 82 Motion for Summary Judgment. A separate Judgment shall enter dismissing case. cc: Counsel, plaintiff pro se(KJA)
|
|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 6/24/2019 - Defendant Charles Aaron Davis's Motion for Summary Judgment, (R. 68 ), is HEREBY GRANTED. All claims against Defendant Charles Aaron Davis are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendant Charles Aaron Davis as a party to this action. cc: Rodney Smith, pro se (KD)
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 3/13/2018. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendant Joy Meyers from the docket of this action. The Court will enter a separate Scheduling Order to govern the development of the proceeding claims. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Counsel of Record (MNM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
