Moorman v. Kentucky State Penitentiary Officers
| Curtis Moorman |
| Kentucky State Penitentiary Officers, Troy Belt, Jesse Coombs, Brenden Inglish, Nathaniel Deboe and Pillion |
| 5:2018cv00021 |
| February 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Paducah Office |
| Lyon |
| Thomas B. Russell |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 7/10/2018 granting 18 Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to add Perry Sanders, Aaron Jewell, and Tami Bauer as Defendants to this action. The Clerk of Court is further DIRECTED to terminate the 'Three John Doe Officers' as parties to this action. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendants; General Counsel, Justice & Public Safety Cabinet, Office of Legal Counsel(MNM)
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 5/1/2018. Plaintiff shall have 90 days to file an amended complaint in which he names the John Doe Defendants in their individual capacities and describes the excessive force each alle gedly used against him. Plaintiff's failure to timely amend his complaint to name these Defendants may result in their dismissal from the action. cc: Plaintiff, pro se, Defendants, General Counsel, Justice & Public Safety Cabinet, Office of Legal Counsel (KJA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
