McPherson v. Ramey et al
| Britton Levon McPherson |
| Karen Ramey, Unknown Correctional Officer, Dr. Lester Lewis, Kelly Neeley, Correct Care Solutions and James Irwin |
| 5:2019cv00013 |
| February 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Thomas B Russell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 2/19/2019. Granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. cc: Plaintiff, pro se, Financial Section, USDC, WDKY, Little Sandy Correctional Complex, Attn: Inmate Accounts(KJA)
|
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Britton Levon McPherson (MNM) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Britton Levon McPherson (MNM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. (MNM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Correct Care Solutions, James Irwin, Lester Lewis, Kelly Neeley, Karen Ramey, and Unknown Correctional Officer, filed by Britton Levon McPherson. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Summons Tendered, #3 Photographs, #4 Medical Records) (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
