Teague v. Walmart Inc. et al
Veronica Teague |
Walmart Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership |
5:2019cv00080 |
June 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Lanny King |
Thomas B Russell |
Greg N Stivers |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 SCHEDULING ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Lanny King: Scheduling Conference held on 7/22/2019. Amended Pleadings due by 9/5/2019. Daubert Motion due by 6/23/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 6/23/2020. Expert Discovery due by 5/14/2020. Expert Witness (Defendant) due by 3/26/2020. Expert Witness (Plaintiff) due by 2/20/2020. Fact Discovery due by 1/23/2020. Joinder of Parties due by 9/5/2019. Telephone Conference set for 10/21/2019 at 1:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Lanny King. Counsel for the parties shall connect to the conference by dialing the Toll Free Meeting Number 1-877-848-7030 and entering the Access Code 7238577#. cc:counsel (KJA) |
Filing 11 RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Veronica Teague. (Tveite, Charles) |
Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership. (Sharpe, Felix) |
Filing 9 AGREED ORDER OF SUBSTITUTION by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 7/2/2019. See order for specifics.cc:counsel (KJA) |
Filing 8 Proposed Agreed Order/Stipulation by Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership, Walmart Inc.. (Sharpe, Felix) |
Filing 7 ORDER (EBOC) by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 6/17/2019. Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosure due by 7/1/2019. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 7/15/2019. Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 7/22/2019 at 11:00 AM Central time before Magistrate Judge Lanny King. Please review Order in its entirety for specifics. cc: Counsel of Record, CM-King (MNM) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers (EBOC) on 06/17/2019; Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), this matter is hereby referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Lanny King, for resolution of all litigation planning issues, entry of scheduling orders, consideration of amendments thereto, and resolution of all non-dispositive matters, including discovery issues. Judge King is further authorized to conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel; Judge King's Chambers (TJD) |
Filing 5 ORDER OF RECUSAL Case reassigned to Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers for all further proceedings. Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell no longer assigned to case. cc:counsel, CM-Stivers (KJA) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal. cc: Counsel of Record, Marshall Circuit Court (MNM) |
Filing 3 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. (MNM) |
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand previously filed in state court action by Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership, and Walmart Inc. (MNM) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent WSE Management, LLC, and Corporate Parent WSE Investment, LLC for Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership. (MNM) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Walmart Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership from Marshall Circuit Court, case number 19-CI-00123 (filing fee $400, receipt number 0644-2876359). (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Memorandum in Support, #3 Affidavit, #4 Cover Sheet) (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.