Motorists Mutual Insurance Company v. Quest Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
| Motorists Mutual Insurance Company |
| Quest Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
| 5:2019cv00187 |
| December 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Thomas B Russell |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 1/17/2020. Granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Elderidge A. Nichols, Jr. ; granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Patrick Hofer. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel(KJA)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Patrick Hofer to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number 0644-3020299. by Plaintiff Motorists Mutual Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Application for pro hac vice, #2 Proposed Order granting pro hac vice) (Walter, Richard)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION Re:PDF Error: INCORRECT document attached to docket entry by efiler re: #5 MOTION for Elderidge A. Nichols, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number 0644-3020141. ; Correct document attached to this entry. (Walter, Richard)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Elderidge A. Nichols, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number 0644-3020141. by Plaintiff Motorists Mutual Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Supplement Motion for Admission, #2 Proposed Order Granting pro hac vice) (Walter, Richard) (Main Document 5 replaced on 1/14/2020) (KJA).
|
|
Filing 4
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Motorists Mutual Insurance Company. (Walter, Richard)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Quest Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (MNM)
|
|
Filing 2
Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. (MNM)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Quest Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Filing fee $400, receipt number 0644-2994840, filed by Motorists Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit 14, #16 Exhibit 15, #17 Exhibit 16, #18 Exhibit 17, #19 Cover Sheet, #20 Summons Tendered) (MNM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Motorists Mutual Insurance Company v. Quest Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Motorists Mutual Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Richard L. Walter |
| Represented By: | Patrick Hofer |
| Represented By: | Elderidge A. Nichols |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Quest Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
