Miller v. Workman et al
Plaintiff: Ezell Miller
Defendant: George Workman, Mayfield Messenger and Edward Jackson
Case Number: 5:2019cv00188
Filed: December 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Thomas B Russell
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 1/9/2020. Granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis cc: Plaintiff, pro se, Financial Section, USDC, WDKY, Henderson County Detention Center, Attn: Inmate Accounts, P.O. Box 979,Henderson, KY 42419(KJA)
January 2, 2020 Filing 9 Response to #3 Notice of Deficiency, filed by Ezell Miller. All deficiencies are now satisfied. (MNM)
January 2, 2020 Filing 8 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Ezell Miller. (MNM)
January 2, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Ezell Miller. (MNM)
January 2, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by Ezell Miller. (MNM)
December 4, 2019 Filing 5 Response to #3 Notice of Deficiency (summons), filed by Ezell Miller. (summons attached to DN #1 ) (KJA)
December 4, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Ezell Miller. (KJA)
December 3, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Complaint. Reasons for Deficiency: Summons for Each Defendant, Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees, and Prison Trust Account Statement. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 1/2/2020. (MNM)
December 3, 2019 Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. (MNM)
December 3, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Edward Jackson, Mayfield Messenger, and George Workman, filed by Ezell Miller. (MNM) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/4/2019: #1 Summons) (KJA). (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/2/2020: #2 Additional Summonses Tendered) (MNM).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. Workman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: George Workman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mayfield Messenger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ezell Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?