Fry v. Lamb et al
| Shaun Patrick Fry |
| Steve Lamb and Kevin Etheridge |
| 5:2020cv00005 |
| January 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Thomas B Russell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 1/30/2020. Granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. cc: Plaintiff, pro se, Financial Section, USDC, WDKY, CPRC, Attn: Inmate Acct. #201700, 530 County Park Road, Paducah, KY 42001(KJA)
|
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Kevin Etheridge, Steve Lamb, filed by Shaun Patrick Fry. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (KJA) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 1/27/2020. 5:20-cv-5-TBR shall be the lead case; 5:20-cv-8-TBR is administratively dismissed. See order for specifics.cc: plaintiff pro se (KJA)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Shaun Patrick Fry. (MNM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. (MNM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kevin Etheridge and Steve Lamb, filed by Shaun Patrick Fry. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Summons Tendered, #3 Summons Tendered) (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
