Global Hemp, Inc. v. Industrial Hemp Solutions, LLC et al
| Global Hemp, Inc. |
| Marco Vinicio Villatoro, Vini Villatoro, Jeremy Luciano and Industrial Hemp Solutions, LLC |
| 5:2020cv00012 |
| January 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Thomas B Russell |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
TEXT ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 3/25/2020. IT IS ORDERED:1. Counsel who will represent the parties at trial and who have full authority to enter stipulations, to make admissions, and to bind the parties with respect to dates agreed upon or ordered shall be available for a TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ON APRIL 6, 2020 at 9:30 AM CENTRAL TIME. Counsel must call 1-877-848-7030 then give the Access Code 2523122 and #, then when prompted press # again to join the call.2. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) Fed.R.Civ.P. counsel shall discuss and establish a discovery plan which shall be submitted to the Court at the scheduling conference either orally during the telephonic conference or in writing. Counsel are directed to make the mandatory disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(l) Fed.R.Civ.P. by said conference date.3. At the Rule 16 telephonic scheduling conference dates will be fixed for the following, as appropriate to the case: a) Joinder of additional parties and amendments to pleadings. b) Disclosure of deadlines for experts. c) Discovery scope, limits and completion. d) Filing of dispositive motions. e) Exchange of exhibits and final witness lists. f) Conferences before trial, including a final pretrial conference. g) Trial. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc:counsel (KPH)
|
|
Filing 11
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Industrial Hemp Solutions, LLC, Jeremy Luciano, Marco Vinicio Villatoro. (Morgan, Jessica)
|
|
Filing 10
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Industrial Hemp Solutions, LLC, Jeremy Luciano, Marco Vinicio Villatoro. (Sigler, James)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by James A. Sigler on behalf of Industrial Hemp Solutions, LLC, Jeremy Luciano, Marco Vinicio Villatoro (Sigler, James)
|
|
Filing 8
SUPPLEMENT re #1 Complaint, by Global Hemp, Inc.. (Phillips, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Filing re: Patent or Trademark re #1 Complaint. (MNM)
|
|
Filing 6
Summons Issued as to Industrial Hemp Solutions, LLC, Jeremy Luciano, and Marco Vinicio Villatoro. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (MNM)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 1/25/2020. Granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Jonathan LA Phillips. cc: Counsel(KJA)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Jonathan LA Phillips to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $125, receipt number P33004051, filed by Plaintiff Global Hemp, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (MNM)
|
|
Filing 3
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Global Hemp, Inc. (MNM)
|
|
Filing 2
Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. (MNM)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Industrial Hemp Solutions, LLC, Jeremy Luciano, and Marco Vinicio Villatoro. Filing fee $400, receipt number P33004051, filed by Global Hemp, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Summons Tendered) (MNM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
