Quarles v. MSSC US, Inc.
| Victor Quarles |
| MSSC US, Inc. |
| 5:2020cv00034 |
| February 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Thomas B Russell |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Victor Quarles. (Zoppoth, Bradley) |
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 4/8/2020. IT IS ORDERED:1. Counsel who will represent the parties at trial and who have full authority to enter stipulations, to make admissions, and to bind the parties with respect to dates agreed upon or ordered shall be available for a TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ON APRIL 16, 2020 at 10:00 AM CENTRAL TIME. The Court will place the call to counsel.2. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) Fed.R.Civ.P. counsel shall discuss and establish a discovery plan which shall be submitted to the Court at the scheduling conference either orally during the telephonic conference or in writing. Counsel are directed to make the mandatory disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(l) Fed.R.Civ.P. by said conference date.3. At the Rule 16 telephonic scheduling conference dates will be fixed for the following, as appropriate to the case: a) Joinder of additional parties and amendments to pleadings. b) Disclosure of deadlines for experts. c) Discovery scope, limits and completion. d) Filing of dispositive motions. e) Exchange of exhibits and final witness lists. f) Conferences before trial, including a final pretrial conference. g) Trial. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc:counsel (KPH)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by MSSC US, Inc.. (Fletcher, Ben) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to MSSC US, Inc. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (MNM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. (MNM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MSSC US, Inc. Filing fee $400, receipt number 0644-3045582, filed by Victor Quarles. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Email, #2 Exhibit 2 - 7/18/2019 Work Restrictions, #3 Exhibit 3 - FMLA Paperwork, #4 Exhibit 4 - 10/23/2019 Work Restrictions, #5 Exhibit 5 - Updated FMLA Paperwork, #6 Exhibit 6 - Safety Violation Pictures, #7 Cover Sheet, #8 Summons Tendered) (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Quarles v. MSSC US, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MSSC US, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Ben S. Fletcher, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Victor Quarles | |
| Represented By: | Bradley S. Zoppoth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
