Grimaldi v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
Rayna Lynn Grimaldi |
Chattem, Inc., Sanofi US Services, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Pfizer, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
5:2020cv00046 |
March 5, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Thomas B Russell |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Remark: Case transferred from Kentucky Western has been opened in Southern District of Florida as case 9:20-cv-80572. (KJA) |
Filing 4 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER No. CTO-9 from SD/FL re MDL 2924 (KJA) |
Case transferred to District of SD/FL. Case electronically transferred. (KJA) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Chattem, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Pfizer, Inc., and Sanofi US Services, Inc. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (MNM) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. (MNM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Chattem, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Pfizer, Inc., and Sanofi US Services, Inc. Filing fee $400, receipt number 0644-3058699, filed by Rayna Lynn Grimaldi. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Tendered) (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.