Noffsinger v. Pennyroyal Services, Inc.
| Jessica E. Noffsinger |
| Pennyroyal Services, Inc. |
| 5:2020cv00143 |
| August 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Thomas B Russell |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Jessica E. Noffsinger. (Korus, Tyler) |
| Filing 8 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Pennyroyal Services, Inc.. (Johnson, Craig) |
| Filing 7 RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Pennyroyal Services, Inc.. (Johnson, Craig) |
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 10/14/2020. IT IS ORDERED:1. Counsel shall be available for a TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ON OCTOBER 20, 2020 at 11:15 AM CENTRAL TIME. The Court will place the call to counsel.2. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) Fed.R.Civ.P. counsel shall discuss and establish a discovery plan which shall be submitted to the Court at the scheduling conference either orally during the telephonic conference or in writing. Counsel are directed to make the mandatory disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(l) Fed.R.Civ.P. by said conference date.3. At the Rule 16 telephonic scheduling conference dates will be fixed for the following, as appropriate to the case: a) Joinder of additional parties and amendments to pleadings. b) Disclosure of deadlines for experts. c) Discovery scope, limits and completion. d) Filing of dispositive motions. e) Exchange of exhibits and final witness lists. f) Conferences before trial, including a final pretrial conference. g) Trial. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. cc:counsel (KPH)
|
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Pennyroyal Services, Inc.. (Johnson, Craig) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Pennyroyal Services, Inc.. (Johnson, Craig) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Pennyroyal Services, Inc. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (MNM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. (MNM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pennyroyal Services, Inc. Filing fee $400, receipt number 0644-3169331, filed by Jessica E. Noffsinger. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Tendered) (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Noffsinger v. Pennyroyal Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jessica E. Noffsinger | |
| Represented By: | Tyler Z. Korus |
| Represented By: | Robert L. Roark |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pennyroyal Services, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Chad M. Zimlich |
| Represented By: | Craig L. Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
