Hollon v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
| Robert Lee Hollon |
| Ronald Reagan Presidential Library, Correct Care Services of Tennessee, Mrs. Ponsetti, Central Intelligence Agency and Gini Haspell |
| 5:2021cv00023 |
| February 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Thomas B Russell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 2/24/2021 granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Financial Section, USDC, WDKY; Kentucky State Penitentiary, Inmate Acct. # 122648, 266 Water Street, Eddyville, KY 42038 (MNM)
|
| Filing 4 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. (MNM) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Robert Lee Hollon. (MNM) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Robert Lee Hollon. (MNM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Central Intelligence Agency, Correct Care Services of Tennessee, Gini Haspell, Ponsetti, and Ronald Reagan Presidential Library, filed by Robert Lee Hollon. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Summons Tendered) (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
