Richmond v. AmeriBen et al
Plaintiff: Thomas Richmond
Defendant: Orthopedic Institute of Western Kentucky and AmeriBen
Case Number: 5:2021cv00029
Filed: February 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Thomas B Russell
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Order for proceedings held before Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell: Telephone Conference held on 4/14/2021. See order for specifics. cc:counsel (KJA)
March 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 3/17/2021. Granting #12 Motion Excuse Compliance with FRCP 26(a) and FRCP 26(f) and for Protective Order Precluding Discovery. cc: Counsel(KJA)
March 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Order for proceedings held before Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell: Telephone Conference held on 3/17/2021. Telephonic status/ Scheduling Conference set for 4/14/2021 at 10:00 AM before Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. See order for call in information. cc:counsel (KJA)
March 15, 2021 Filing 12 MOTION to Excuse Compliance with FRCP 26(a) and FRCP 26(f) and for Protective Order Precluding Discovery re 11 Order by Defendant AmeriBen. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Excuse Compliance with FRCP 26(a) and FRCP 26(f) and for Protective Order Precluding Discovery, #2 Proposed Order) (Durham, Darryl) Modified on 3/16/2021 to edit text (MNM).
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 TEXT ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 3/9/2021. IT IS ORDERED:1. Counsel shall be available for a TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ON MARCH 17, 2021 at 10:00 AM CENTRAL TIME. The Court will place the call to counsel.2. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) Fed.R.Civ.P. counsel shall discuss and establish a discovery plan which shall be submitted to the Court at the scheduling conference either orally during the telephonic conference or in writing. Counsel are directed to make the mandatory disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(l) Fed.R.Civ.P. by said conference date.3. At the Rule 16 telephonic scheduling conference dates will be fixed for the following, as appropriate to the case: a) Joinder of additional parties and amendments to pleadings. b) Disclosure of deadlines for experts. c) Discovery scope, limits and completion. d) Filing of dispositive motions. e) Exchange of exhibits and final witness lists. f) Conferences before trial, including a final pretrial conference. g) Trial. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc:counsel (KPH)
March 2, 2021 Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by Orthopedic Institute of Western Kentucky. (Straub, E.)
February 26, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by E. Frederick Straub, Jr on behalf of Orthopedic Institute of Western Kentucky (Straub, E.)
February 24, 2021 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by AmeriBen. (Durham, Darryl)
February 22, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by B. Keith Saksefski on behalf of AmeriBen (Saksefski, B.)
February 22, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE to Parties of the Filing of a Notice of Removal by AmeriBen (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Notice of Removal) (Durham, Darryl) Modified on 2/23/2021 to add attachment description (MNM).
February 22, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Compliance by AmeriBen (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Defendant's Notice to the State Court, #2 Exhibit - Defendant's Notice to the Parties) (Durham, Darryl) Modified on 2/23/2021 to add attachment descriptions (MNM).
February 19, 2021 Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal. cc: Counsel of Record, Graves Circuit Court (MNM)
February 19, 2021 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Anthem, Inc. for AmeriBen. (MNM)
February 19, 2021 Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. (MNM)
February 19, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by AmeriBen from Graves Circuit Court, case number 21-CI00006 (filing fee $402, receipt number 0644-3287673). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration in Support, #2 Exhibit CT Transmittal, #3 Exhibit Redacted EOB, #4 Exhibit 2019 Summary Plan Description, #5 Exhibit Medical Insurance Plan, #6 Exhibit Administrative Information Chapter, #7 Exhibit State Court File, #8 Cover Sheet) (MNM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richmond v. AmeriBen et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Richmond
Represented By: Richard W. Kemp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Orthopedic Institute of Western Kentucky
Represented By: E. Frederick Straub, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AmeriBen
Represented By: B. Keith Saksefski
Represented By: Darryl William Durham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?