McNally v. The Kingdom Trust Company
| Daniel McNally |
| The Kingdom Trust Company |
| 5:2021cv00068 |
| June 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Thomas B Russell |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
MOTION for Leave to File Sur-reply to Plaintiff Motion to Remand by Defendant The Kingdom Trust Company (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order) (Farah, Licha)
|
|
Filing 25
REPLY to Response to Motion re #15 MOTION to Remand filed by Daniel McNally. (Shannon, William)
|
|
Filing 24
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 7/14/2021. Granting #20 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply; see order for specifics. cc: Counsel(KJA)
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 7/9/2021. Granting #13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Paul J. Scarlato. cc: Counsel,ECF packet sent with order.(KJA)
|
|
Response to #8 Notice of Deficiency, #18 Notice of Deficiency, #10 Notice of Deficiency, #14 Notice of Deficiency, #9 Notice of Deficiency. All deficiencies have now been satisfied. (MNM)
|
|
Filing 22
NOTICE of filing Certificate of Good Standing for Paul J. Scarlato by Daniel McNally re #13 MOTION for Paul J. Scarlato to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Certificate of Good Standing for Scarlato) (Shannon, William)
|
|
Filing 21
RESPONSE to Motion re #15 MOTION to Remand filed by The Kingdom Trust Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Class Action Complaint, #2 Exhibit Kingdom Trust Company Motion to Dismiss, #3 Exhibit McNally Opposition to Def. Kingdom Motion to Dismiss, #4 Exhibit Kingdom Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #5 Exhibit Civil Minutes-Order Granting Motion to Dismiss) (Farah, Licha)
|
|
Filing 20
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss by Plaintiff Daniel McNally (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Shannon, William)
|
|
Filing 19
NOTICE of filing proposed order by Daniel McNally re #15 MOTION to Remand (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Shannon, William)
|
|
Filing 18
NOTICE of Deficiency re #15 Motion to Remand. Reason for Deficiency: Proposed Order. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 7/13/2021. (MNM)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 7/2/2021 granting #11 Motion for Hugh D. Berkson to Appear Pro Hac Vice. cc: Counsel; mailed to attorney Berkson with ECF registration packet(MNM)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 7/2/2021 granting #12 Motion for Alan Rosca to Appear Pro Hac Vice. cc: Counsel; mailed to attorney Rosca with ECF registration packet(MNM)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION to Remand by Plaintiff Daniel McNally (Shannon, William) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/7/2021: #1 Proposed Order) (MNM).
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE of Deficiency re #13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice.Reason for Deficiency: certificate of good standing. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 7/9/2021. (KJA)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION for Paul J. Scarlato to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Plaintiff Daniel McNally Filing fee $ 125; receipt no. P33004128. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (KJA) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/9/2021: #2 Certificate of Good Standing) (MNM).
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION for Alan Rosca to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Plaintiff Daniel McNally (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Receipt P33004126) (KJA)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Hugh D. Berkson to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Plaintiff Daniel McNally (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Receipt P33004127) (KJA)
|
|
Filing 10
ATTORNEY NOTICE of Deficiency to Paul Scarlato re #1 Notice of Removal.Reason for Deficiency: motion to appear pro hac vice not filed. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 7/6/2021. (KJA)
|
|
Filing 9
ATTORNEY NOTICE of Deficiency to Hugh D. Berkson re #1 Notice of Removal.Reason for Deficiency: motion to appear pro hac vice not filed. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 7/6/2021. (KJA)
|
|
Filing 8
ATTORNEY NOTICE of Deficiency to Alan Rosca re #1 Notice of Removal.Reason for Deficiency: motion to appear pro hac vice not filed. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 7/6/2021. (KJA)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant The Kingdom Trust Company (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Farah, Licha)
|
|
Filing 6
CLERK'S NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal. cc: Counsel of Record, Calloway Circuit Court (MNM)
|
|
Filing 5
Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Kingdom Trust Company. (MNM)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Whitney N. Williams on behalf of The Kingdom Trust Company. (MNM)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Licha H. Farah, Jr. on behalf of The Kingdom Trust Company. (MNM)
|
|
Filing 2
Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. (MNM)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by The Kingdom Trust Company from Calloway Circuit Court, case number 21-CI-00147 (filing fee $402, receipt number 0644-3359625). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - State Summons, #3 Exhibit C - State Summons, #4 Exhibit D - Motion to Dismiss Filed in State Action, #5 Exhibit E - Exhibits to Motion to Dismiss, #6 Exhibit F - Proposed Order for Motion to Dismiss, #7 Cover Sheet) (MNM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
