In The Matter of Whitetail Vessel Company, LLC, as Owner, and Inland Marine Service, Inc., as Owner pro hace vice,
| In The Matter of Whitetail Vessel Company, LLC, as Owner, and Inland Marine Service, Inc., as Owner pro hace vice, |
| 5:2021cv00129 |
| September 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Thomas B Russell |
| Marine |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Filing Affidavit of Publication by In The Matter of Whitetail Vessel Company, LLC, as Owner, and Inland Marine Service, Inc., as Owner pro hace vice, (Attachments: #1 Affidavit) (Sullivan, Megan)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Publication by In The Matter of Whitetail Vessel Company, LLC, as Owner, and Inland Marine Service, Inc., as Owner pro hace vice, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Legal Notice) (Sullivan, Megan)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE to Claimants of Action Brought for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability by In The Matter of Whitetail Vessel Company, LLC, as Owner, and Inland Marine Service, Inc., as Owner pro hace vice, (Sullivan, Megan)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 9/20/2021. Granting [] Motion for Ad Interim Stipulation and Directing Issuance of Notice. cc: Counsel(KJA)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 9/20/2021. Granting #3 Motion for Restraining Order. cc: Counsel(KJA)
|
|
MOTION for Ad Interim Stipulation and Directing Issuance of Notice by Petitioner In The Matter of Whitetail Vessel Company, LLC, as Owner, and Inland Marine Service, Inc., as Owner pro hace vice, (SEE DN #3 FOR FULL VIEWING) (KJA)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Restraining Order by Petitioner In The Matter of Whitetail Vessel Company, LLC, as Owner, and Inland Marine Service, Inc., as Owner pro hace vice, (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Proposed Order) (Sullivan, Megan)
|
|
Filing 2
Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. (MNM)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT FOR EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY, In The Matter of Whitetail Vessel Company, LLC, as Owner, and Inland Marine Service, Inc., as Owner pro hace vice, of the M/V Bobby Thompson, Official No. 518256. Filing fee $402, receipt number 0644-3419651. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Vessel Value, #2 Exhibit B - Stipulation of No Pending Freight, #3 Exhibit C - Stipulation of Pending Freight, #4 Exhibit D - Letter of Undertaking, #5 Exhibit E - Stipulation for Costs) (MNM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: In The Matter of Whitetail Vessel Company, LLC, as Owner, and Inland Marine Service, Inc., as Owner pro hace vice, | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In The Matter of Whitetail Vessel Company, LLC, as Owner, and Inland Marine Service, Inc., as Owner pro hace vice, | |
| Represented By: | Megan A. Sullivan |
| Represented By: | Robert Nienhuis |
| Represented By: | Todd M. Powers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
