Mitchell v. Liebenrood et al
| Cindy Mitchell |
| A. Liebenrood and Parish |
| 5:2021cv00135 |
| September 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Thomas B Russell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 11/9/2021. Granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File; granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Plaintiff shall comply with deficiencies within 30 days of entry of this order; clerk shall sent a 1983 complaint form with this case number and amended. See order for specifics. cc: plaintiff pro se(KJA)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time by Plaintiff Cindy Mitchell (MNM) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time by Plaintiff Cindy Mitchell (KJA) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE ON SUMMONS re #1 Complaint (KJA) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Complaint.Reason for Deficiency: Form, IFP or Fee. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 10/14/2021. (1983 packet mailed) (KJA) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. (KJA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against A. Liebenrood, Parish, filed by Cindy Mitchell. (KJA) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/14/2021: #1 Envelope) (KJA). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
