Evans v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Tanner Evans |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 5:2021cv00174 |
| November 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Lanny King |
| Thomas B Russell |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD received from Social Security by Commissioner of Social Security. (Wang-Grimm, Jessie) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security. (Wang-Grimm, Jessie) |
| Filing 9 CASE REASSIGNED to Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell pursuant to General Order No. 2019-11.(cc: counsel, Judge Russell CM) (MHB) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Social Security Case Assignment re #1 Complaint. Social Security Notice due by 12/20/2021. (MNM) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF SERVICE pursuant to #General Order 2021-20: The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Kentucky having consented to electronic service of process of complaints seeking judicial review pursuant to 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), this notice shall constitute acceptance of service as outlined in Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1)(A) and (C). This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official Entry. No document is attached. (MNM) |
Filing 6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 11/29/2021 granting #4 Motion for Bryan M. Konoski to Appear Pro Hac Vice. cc: Counsel(MNM)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 11/29/2021 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. cc: Counsel(MNM)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 125, receipt number AKYWDC-3477213. by Plaintiff Tanner Evans (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Konoski, Bryan) (Main Document 4 replaced on 11/24/2021) (MNM). (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/24/2021: #2 Certificates of Good Standing) (MNM). |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Tanner Evans. (Attachments: #1 Application, #2 Proposed Order) (MNM) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Lanny King. (MNM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Tanner Evans. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Tendered) (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Evans v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tanner Evans | |
| Represented By: | Bryan M. Konoski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Seth Schecter |
| Represented By: | Timothy D. Thompson |
| Represented By: | Jessie A. Wang-Grimm |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
