Ellegood v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Anissa Garnet Ellegood |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 5:2022cv00003 |
| January 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Lanny King |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
SOCIAL SECURITY ORDER (EBOC) signed by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 3/7/2022; Social Security Submission due by 6/6/2022. (Attachments: #1 Fact and Law Summary Form)cc: Counsel (MNM)
|
|
Filing 9
CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Anissa Garnet Ellegood. (MNM)
|
|
Filing 8
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD received from Social Security by Commissioner of Social Security. (Julis, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 7
ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security. (Julis, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice of Social Security Case Assignment re #1 Complaint. Social Security Notice due by 2/15/2022. (MNM)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF SERVICE pursuant to #General Order 2021-20: The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Kentucky having consented to electronic service of process of complaints seeking judicial review pursuant to 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), this notice shall constitute acceptance of service as outlined in Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1)(A) and (C). This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official Entry. No document is attached. (MNM)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 1/25/2022 granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3), the Clerk of Court is appointed to effectuate service on the Commissioner of Social Security and the United States Attorney for the Western District of Kentucky electronically by following the process outlined in General Order No. 2120. cc: Counsel(MNM)
|
|
Filing 3
Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Lanny King. (MNM)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Anissa Garnet Ellegood. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (MNM)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Anissa Garnet Ellegood. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Tendered) (MNM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ellegood v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Anissa Garnet Ellegood | |
| Represented By: | Millicent Kay Green |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Seth Schecter |
| Represented By: | Timothy D. Thompson |
| Represented By: | Rachel S. Julis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
