Perry v. Fulton County Detention Center
| Jeffrey Alan Perry, II and Jeffrey Alan Hearington |
| Fulton County Detention Center |
| 5:2022cv00009 |
| January 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Thomas B Russell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 3/3/2022. Granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis cc: Plaintiff, pro se, Financial Section, USDC, WDKY, FCDC, Attn. Inmate Accts(KJA)
|
| Filing 6 Response to #5 Notice of Deficiency filed by Jeffrey Alan Perry, II. (signature page attached to DN 1) (KJA) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Deficiency re #1 Complaint. Reason for Deficiency: Lack of Original Signature on Complaint. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 2/22/2022. (MNM) |
| Filing 4 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. (MNM) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jeffrey Alan Perry, II. (MNM) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jeffrey Alan Perry, II. (MNM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fulton County Detention Center, filed by Jeffrey Alan Perry, II. (Attachments: #1 Summons Tendered) (MNM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
