Sadler v. Clifford et al
Anthony Sadler |
Angela Clifford, Shelli Votaw, Dawn Patterson, Denise Burket, Stephanie Thompson, Jaiesha Parks, Margaret Franchere, Austin Bowman, Alisha Wells, Angela Oakes, Patricia Carey, Mary Murphy, Mark Meyermann, Pratul Patel, James Hawkins, Ashley Vanmeter, Brad Adams, Jann Edington, U/A Hawkins, Officer Garrett and C/O Coconougher |
5:2022cv00016 |
January 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
Paducah Office |
Thomas B Russell |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Anthony Sadler. (KJA) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 1/25/2022. Transferring action to US District Court, Eastern Kentucky, Central Division, Lexington.cc: plaintiff pro se (KJA) |
Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. (KJA) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Anthony Sadler. (complaint previously filed in 5:21-cv-63-TBR, 5/21/21) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Summons) (KJA) |
Case transferred to District of Eastern Kentucky. Case electronically transferred. (KJA) |
Remark: Case transferred from Kentucky Western has been opened in Eastern District of Kentucky as case 5:22-cv-00018, filed 01/27/2022 (KJA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.