Puckett v. Hewell et al
| Devin Puckett |
| Brad Hewell and Wendell Lynch |
| 5:2022cv00110 |
| August 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Benjamin Beaton |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER. The Court grants Plaintiff's application to proceed without prepayment of fees #3 cc: Plaintiff (pro se), Finance, BCC- Inmate Accounts(JM)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address by Devin Puckett (JM) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE ON SUMMONS re: DN #1 Complaint (Incomplete Summons). (CDL) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Emotional and Physical Distress by Plaintiff Devin Puckett. (CDL) |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re: DN #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Devin Puckett. (CDL) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Devin Puckett. (CDL) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Benjamin Beaton. (CDL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brad Hewell and Wendell Lynch (Filing Fee not paid), filed by Devin Puckett. (Attachments: #1 Summons Tendered, #2 Attachment - Envelope) (CDL) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/6/2022: #3 Summons (tendered on 9/2/2022), #4 Envelope (from tendered summons)) (JM). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
