Hendershot v. Pella Corporation
| Tammy Hendershot |
| Pella Corporation |
| 5:2023cv00121 |
| September 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky |
| Benjamin Beaton |
| Lanny King |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Tammy Hendershot. (Lofton, Rodger) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Filing of Joint Report of the Parties' Planning Meeting by Pella Corporation re #7 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (Johannsen, August) |
Filing 9
ORDER FOR MEETING AND REPORT (EBOC) by Judge Beaton on 10/10/2023. Telephonic Rule 16 Case Management Conference set for 11/27/2023 at 1:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Lanny King. Counsel for the parties shall connect to the conference by dialing the toll-free number 1-877-848-7030 and entering access code 7238577. cc: counsel (JM)
|
| Filing 8 TEXT ORDER: Under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), the Court refers this matter to Magistrate Judge King for hearing and determining all pretrial matters, including non-dispositive motions. Judge King may conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: counsel (JM) |
| Filing 7 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Pella Corporation. (Johannsen, August) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Pella Corporation. (Johannsen, August) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement (pursuant to Rule 7.1(a)(1)) by Pella Corporation. (Johannsen, August) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Deficiency to August Johannsen re #1 Notice of Removal. Reason for Deficiency: Missing Rule 7.1(a)(1) Corporate Disclosure Statement for Pella Corporation. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 9/12/2023. (DeW) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE to Calloway Circuit Court and Counsel of Record/Parties re #1 Notice of Removal. (DeW) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Benjamin Beaton. (DeW) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Calloway Circuit Court, case number 23-CI-00230, filed by Pella Corporation. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AKYWDC-3876104) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Cover Sheet) (DeW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hendershot v. Pella Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tammy Hendershot | |
| Represented By: | Rodger W. Lofton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pella Corporation | |
| Represented By: | August Johannsen |
| Represented By: | J. Andrew Inman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
