Glenn E. Daulton, Inc. v. Pontchartrain Partners, LLC
Plaintiff: Glenn E. Daulton, Inc.
Defendant: Pontchartrain Partners, LLC
Case Number: 5:2023cv00143
Filed: October 25, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: Benjamin Beaton
Referring Judge: Lanny King
Nature of Suit: Contract: Marine
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 12/11/2023 granting #9 Motion for Attorney Jason R. Anders to Appear Pro Hac Vice. cc: Counsel (JM)
November 30, 2023 Filing 9 MOTION for Attorney Jason R. Anders to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Defendant Pontchartrain Partners, LLC. (Filing fee $ 150 received. Check #640 has been forwarded to LV intake for receipting) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Proposed Order) (JM)
November 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE signed by Magistrate Judge Lanny King on 11/8/2023 granting #6 Motion for Allan C. Crane to Appear Pro Hac Vice. cc: Counsel (SRH)
November 6, 2023 Filing 7 TEXT ORDER: Under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), the Court refers this matter to Magistrate Judge King for hearing and determining all pretrial matters, including non-dispositive motions. Judge King may conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel (HMC)
November 3, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION for Allan C. Crane to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AKYWDC-3915643. by Plaintiff Glenn E. Daulton, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting PHV Admission) (Crane, Allan)
October 27, 2023 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Glenn E. Daulton, Inc.. Pontchartrain Partners, LLC served on 10/27/2023, answer due 11/17/2023. (Miller, Bobby)
October 26, 2023 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Pontchartrain Partners, LLC. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (DJT)
October 26, 2023 Filing 3 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Benjamin Beaton. (DJT)
October 25, 2023 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement (pursuant to Rule 7.1(a)(1)) by Glenn E. Daulton, Inc.. (DJT)
October 25, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pontchartrain Partners, LLC Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AKYWDC-3909238, filed by Glenn E. Daulton, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Barge Agreement, #3 Exhibit B - Statement) (DJT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Glenn E. Daulton, Inc. v. Pontchartrain Partners, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Glenn E. Daulton, Inc.
Represented By: Bobby R. Miller, Jr.
Represented By: Allan C. Crane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pontchartrain Partners, LLC
Represented By: Jason R. Anders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?