Chisholm, et al v. Jindal, et al
| Letisha Tse and Dao Perez |
| Bruce Greenstein |
| 2:1997cv03274 |
| October 20, 1997 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Orleans |
| Carl J. Barbier |
| Alma L. Chasez |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
439
ORDER AND REASONS. It is ORDERED that the Motion to Vacate the 2014 Stipulated Order (Rec. Doc. 420 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier. (gec)
|
|
Filing
395
ORDER AND REASONS denying 384 Motion for Clarification and Stay of the May 21, 2013 Order. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 8/13/2013. (mmm)
|
|
Filing
391
ORDER & REASONS granting 364 plaintiffs' MOTION to Modify Contempt Remedy as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 7/18/13.(sek, )
|
|
Filing
352
ORDER & REASONS: granting in part & denying in part 275 Motion to Enforce Stipulations and Orders. A separate order will be entered providing the precise relief that will be granted. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 6/26/12. (sek, )
|
|
Filing
295
ORDER denying 286 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Stipulations and Orders. FURTHER ORDERED that the submission date for 275 MOTION to Enforce Stipulations and Orders is reset to 3/14/2012. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier. (gec, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
