Imperial Trading Company, Inc. et al v. Lucky Coin Machine Company et al
Case Number: 2:2006cv04262
Filed: August 11, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: New Orleans Office
Presiding Judge: Stanwood R. Duval
Presiding Judge: Joseph C. Wilkinson
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 331 ORDER & REASONS: the court has considered the parties' briefed objections to trial exhibits (R.Doc. # 254, 255, 291, 292, 302, 304, 312, 318, 327, 328, 329) and rules as set forth therein. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 7/31/09.(rll, ) Modified on 7/31/2009 to edit document type (rll, ).
July 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 308 ORDER & REASONS re dft's 249 253 Motions in Limine: IT IS ORDERED that dft's 249 Motion in Limine Preclude Plaintiffs from Introducing Evidence that Defendant Owes Any Amounts for Loss of Business Income Because of Damage to Dependent Property and dft's 253 Motion in Limine to Exclude References to Complaints Made Against Non-Party Van Meredith are both GRANTED as set forth therein. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 7/29/09. (rll, ) Modified on 7/29/2009 to edit document type (rll, ).
July 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 295 ORDER denying dft's 131 Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Paul J. Murray, Jr. as set forth therein. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 7/28/09. (rll, )
July 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 290 ORDER granting dft's 169 Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence Regarding Private Investigator Retained by Defendant's Counsel as set forth therein. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 7/27/09. (rll, ) Modified on 7/27/2009 to edit document type (rll, ).
July 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 281 ORDER re parties' cross motions for partial summary judgment on the issues of "rental value" (R.Doc. #115 and #110) and extra expenses (R.Doc. #117 and #106): For the reasons set forth therein, IT IS ORDERED that 115 pla's motio n for Summary Judgment on rental value is GRANTED IN PART; 110 dft's motion on the same subject is DENIED; 117 pla's motion for summary judgment for certain extra expenses is DENIED; 106 dft's motion on the same issue is GRANTED. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 7/24/09. (rll, )
July 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 229 ORDER GRANTING pla's 119 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on burden shifting and segregation of damages and DENYING dft's 113 Motion for Summary Judgment as to contents at the Airline Drive location as set forth therein. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 7/15/09. (rll, )
May 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER & REASONS re plas' 48 MOTION Review Magistrate Judge's Order Denying Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Reinsurance Information: for reasons contained therein, the Court SUSTAINS plas' objections; FURTHER ORDERED that dft produce documents as set forth therein. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 5/5/09.(rll, ) Modified on 5/5/2009 to edit document type (rll, ).
April 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER & REASONS granting 62 plas' Motion for Jury Trial. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 4/30/09. (rll, ) Modified on 5/1/2009 to edit document type (rll, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Imperial Trading Company, Inc. et al v. Lucky Coin Machine Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?