Gaffney et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
| 2:2006cv08143 |
| October 16, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Alma L. Chasez |
| Sarah S. Vance |
| Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 4072 Payment of Flood Insurance Claim |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
134
ORDER granting in part and denying in part dft's 101 103 Motions in Limine to exclude medical evidence and audio-visual materials for the reasons stated therein. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 7/20/09. (Reference: All cases)(rll, ) Modified on 7/20/2009 to edit document type (rll, ).
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER granting dft's 105 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as set forth therein. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 7/2/09. (Reference: All cases)(rll, )
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER denying dft's 51 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the issue of mental anguish; denying pla's 52 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the applicable burdens of proof. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 10/21/08. (rll, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gaffney et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
