Collins v. Encompass Insurance Co. et al
2:2006cv08547 |
October 18, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Insurance Office |
Ivan L. R. Lemelle |
Joseph C. Wilkinson |
None |
U.S. Government Defendant |
28:1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 ORDER denying 43 Motion for New Trial. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 3/24/2010. (lag, ) |
Filing 40 ORDER granting 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Ivan L. R. Lemelle on 10/14/09.(lag, ) |
Filing 29 ORDERED that Defendant's 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part, with respect to the Court's recognition that Plaintiff failed to submit a Proof of Loss and DENIED in part, with respect to Defendant's request that Plaintif f's claims be dismissed for failure to submit a POL. FURTHER ORDERED that parties conduct additional discovery and provide supplemental briefs (filed no later than 7/29/2009) on the issue of Plaintiff's eye disease and its effect on her failure to file a sworn proof of loss. FURTHER ORDERED that pretrial conference and trial are continued as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Ivan L. R. Lemelle.(gec, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Collins v. Encompass Insurance Co. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.