Laforge v. ECC Operating Services, Inc. et al
| John Laforge |
| ECC Operating Services, Inc., Environmental Chemical Corporation, Envirocon, Inc. and National Union Insurance Group of Pittsburgh, PA |
| Envirocon, Inc. |
| ECC Operating Services, Inc. and Environmental Chemical Corporation |
| Envirocon, Inc. |
| Environmental Chemical Corporation |
| 2:2007cv00523 |
| January 26, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Plaquemines |
| Lance M Africk |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
399
ORDER denying 392 Motion in Limine filed by plaintiff, John LaForge. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 2/4/10. (sek, )
|
|
Filing
363
ORDER & REASONS denying pla's 322 Motion FOR DECLARATION OF JUDICIAL ADMISSIONS AND TO STRIKE NEWPARK/SOLOCO'S ASSERTIONS AND ADDITIONS TO THE PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 12/30/09. (rll, ) Modified on 12/31/2009 to edit document type (rll, ).
|
|
Filing
289
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 279 Motion to Strike; FURTHER ORDERED that Newpark/Soloco shall pay the attorneys fees associated with the filing of this motion. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk. (car, )
|
|
Filing
264
ORDER denying 214 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk. (car, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
