Lindsley et al v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. et al
Louis F. Lindsley, Louis Lindsley, Jr., Kevin L. Bradke, Edward G. Bradke, Steve Flint, David Powell and Carroll Lawson |
BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., Robert J. Parker and Directional Road Boring, Inc. |
2:2007cv06569 |
October 9, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
Out of State |
Mary Ann Vial Lemmon |
Joseph C. Wilkinson |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 92 ORDER dismissing as moot in part and denying in part 89 Motion for Sanctions. ORDERED that plaintiffs (other than the dismissed plaintiff Louis F. Lindsley) must respond to defendants discovery requests fully and in writing, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 33 and 34, and make all responsive documents or other tangible items available to defendants counsel no later than July 17, 2009 at 4:00 p.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Wilkinson, Jr on 7/8/09. (NEF sent to Judge Lemmon)(blg) |
Filing 80 ORDER AND REASONS granting 66 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon. (ecm, ) |
Filing 78 ORDER AND REASONS denying 73 Motion to Strike 66 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Louis F. Lindsley. Signed by Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon. (ecm, ) |
Filing 61 ORDER denying 58 Motion for Leave to File cmp. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Wilkinson, Jr. (car, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.