Lemieux v. Stegeman
Plaintiff: Walter Lemieux
Defendant: Russell S Stegeman
Case Number: 2:2008cv00965
Filed: February 22, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: New Orleans Office
County: Iberville
Presiding Judge: Mary Ann Vial Lemmon
Presiding Judge: Karen Wells Roby
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's claim against Russell S. Stegeman is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon. (NEF: Magistrate Judge Roby)(ecm, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lemieux v. Stegeman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Walter Lemieux
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Russell S Stegeman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?