Fitch et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Irby Fitch, Brittany Fitch and Dorothy Stewart |
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
2:2008cv01639 |
April 14, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
Jefferson |
Daniel E. Knowles |
Sarah S. Vance |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 170 ORDER denying 157 Motion for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b) as set forth herein. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 10/28/2010. (Reference: All cases)(rll, ) |
Filing 155 ORDER & REASONS granting dft Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s 132 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment for the reasons stated. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 4/29/2010. (Reference: 9-3466)(rll, ) |
Filing 127 ORDER & REASONS re 22 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Alternative Motion to Dismiss Class Claims filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.: For the reasons stated, Wells Fargo's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 2/1/2010.(Reference: 08-1639)(rll, ) Modified on 2/1/2010 to edit document type (rll, ). |
Filing 125 ORDER & REASONS: For the reasons stated, dft Wells Fargo Bank N.A's 87 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and & 89 Motion to Stay Temporarily All Class Certification Proceedings and Class Discovery is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 1/20/2010. (Reference: 09-3466)(rll, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.