Harvey Canal Limited Partnership v. Nabors Offshore Drilling, Inc.
Plaintiff: Harvey Canal Limited Partnership
Defendant: Nabors Offshore Drilling, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2008cv01990
Filed: April 25, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Sally Shushan
Presiding Judge: Jay C. Zainey
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER & REASONS denying 67 Motion to Exclude; denying 68 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Jay C. Zainey on 1/19/2010. (gbw, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harvey Canal Limited Partnership v. Nabors Offshore Drilling, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Harvey Canal Limited Partnership
Represented By: Paul N. Vance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nabors Offshore Drilling, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?