Francois v. Rigdon et al
| Christopher Andy Francois |
| William Rigdon, Wade Rigdon, Kevin Luper, Jhon Knight, Sgt. Brumfleid, Jeff Williams, Mickey Dillion, Patrick Martin, James Seal, Cory Jackson, Sgt. Stakes, Maulisa Hendrick and Unidentified Party |
| 2:2008cv03485 |
| May 28, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office |
| Orleans |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Jay C. Zainey |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 57 ORDERED that defendants' 45 Motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Christopher Andy Francois's complaint is dismissed w/o prej for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. FURTHER ORDERED that the warden of Rayburn Correctional Center shall thoroughly review the second grievance filed by Francois w/in 60 days of the date of this order to allow him to properly exhaust administrative remedies. Signed by Judge Jay C. Zainey on 5/14/09.(gbw, )
|
|
Filing
57
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 45 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Mickey Dillion, John Knight, Kevin Luper, William Rigdon, James Seal, Patrick Martin, Cory Jackson, Jeff Williams, Wade Rigdon. Objections to R&R due by 4/17/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 4/3/09.(rll, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
