McDonald et al v. Hummingbird Aviation, LLC et al
| Thomas R. McDonald and Richard Ladner |
| Hummingbird Aviation, LLC and Charles Priestley |
| 2:2008cv03501 |
| May 21, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Out of State |
| Alma L. Chasez |
| Sarah S. Vance |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Insurance Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER & REASONS re plas' 39 MOTION to Enforce Settlement, dfts' 43 MOTION to Withdraw Douglas D. Brown as Attorney: For the reasons set forth in document, the Court DENIES plas' 39 Motion to Enforcement Settlement and extends unt il 11/30/2009 the deadline for parties to file mtn to reopen if settlement not consummated by that date; case remains closed in the interim; the Court does not have jurisdiction to hear dfts' 43 Motion to Withdraw; if Court is moved to reopen before 11/30/2009 and Court deems appropriate, the Court will hear dfts' motion at that time. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 11/10/09.(rll, ) Modified on 11/10/2009 to edit document type (rll, ).
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER & REASONS denying 23 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Witnesses and Exhibits as set forth therein. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 6/30/09.(rll, ) Modified on 6/30/2009 to edit document type (rll, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
