Washington v. Wackenhut Corporation
Plaintiff: Keiona S. Washington
Defendant: Wackenhut Corporation
Case Number: 2:2008cv03682
Filed: June 10, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: St Tammany
Presiding Judge: Carl Barbier
Presiding Judge: Sally Shushan
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER granting Wackenhut's 22 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sally Shushan. (ecm, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Washington v. Wackenhut Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keiona S. Washington
Represented By: Joseph F. Myers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wackenhut Corporation
Represented By: Elizabeth Haecker Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?