Lionheart Development, LLC et al v. Apex Building Systems, LLC et al
| Lionheart Development, LLC, Bob Barton and GCMH, LLC |
| Apex Building Systems, LLC, Apex Homes, Inc. and Robert Nipple |
| 2:2008cv04070 |
| July 30, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Orleans |
| Sally Shushan |
| Sarah S. Vance |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
136
ORDER & REASONS: for the reasons stated, the Court DENIES intervenor's 126 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings GRANTS pla's and dft's 127 129 Motions to Dismiss and DISMISSES this case. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 3/18/2011. (rll, )
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER & REASONS granting 73 Motion to Dismiss Party. Francis Musso dismissed; granting 80 Motion to Dismiss Party. Party Kent Jenkins dismissed. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 3/31/2010. (rll, ) Modified on 4/1/2010 to edit text & document type (rll, ).
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER: for the reasons herein the Court GRANTS 46 Motion to Enroll as Counsel of Record for pla Lionheart Development L.L.C. and GRANTS pla Lionheart Development L.L.C.'s 47 Motion to Reopen under Rule 60(b). Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 10/1/09. (rll, )
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER & REASONS denying dfts' 8 Motion to Dismiss Case. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 1/5/09. (rll, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
