Maronge v. Hunt Petroleum Company et al
| Phillip Maronge |
| Hunt Petroleum Company and Island Operating Company, Inc. |
| 2:2008cv04959 |
| November 18, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Terrebonne |
| Helen G. Berrigan |
| Joseph C. Wilkinson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
182
ORDER and REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration 172 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion to Strike Documents Attached to Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 175 is DENIED as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 1/4/2011. (cab)
|
|
Filing
169
ORDER and REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that XTO Offshore Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment 75 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Eagle Consulting, LLC Motion for Summary Judgment 88 is GRANTED. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Island Operating Company, Inc. Motion for Summary judgment 100 is GRANTED as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 9/28/2010. (cab)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER & REASONS re: 55 MOTION to Strike Settlement. Maronge's Motion to Strike Settlement is GRANTED and this matter is REOPENED. Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 3/30/2010 10:00 AM before case manager. Signed by Judge Helen G. Berrigan on 3/3/10.(plh, ) Modified doc type on 3/3/2010 (plh, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
