Sarsour et al v. Oakwood Shopping Center Limited Partnership et al
| Muntaha Sarsour, Sajedeh Judett and Mazin Sarsour |
| Oakwood Shopping Center Limited Partnership, General Growth Properties, Inc., Alliedbarton Security Services, L.L.C. and L. Weatherford |
| 2:2009cv02820 |
| February 19, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Jefferson |
| Kurt D. Engelhardt |
| Sally Shushan |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDER and REASONS granting 57 Motion for Summary Judgment as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 5/25/2012. (cab)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER and REASONS - Presently before the Court is Defendant's second "Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss" 16 , which is directed against Plaintiffs' First Amending and Superseding Complaint (Rec. Doc. 18). IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 3/29/2011. (cab) Modified on 3/29/2011 to edit document type (cab).
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER and REASONS - Presently before the Court is Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss 10 . IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 3/12/2010. (cab) Modified on 3/15/2010 to edit document type (cab).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
