Yelton et al v. PHI, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Kelly Yelton and Steven Yelton
Defendant: PHI, Inc., Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation and Aeronautical Accessories, Inc
Case Number: 2:2009cv03144
Filed: March 26, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: Marine Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Carl Barbier
Presiding Judge: Karen Wells Roby
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 00:0000 Cause Code Unknown

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 760 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 707 PHI Inc's Motion for Attorney Fees; FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation shall submit payment to Defendant PHI, Inc. in the amount of $577,206.50 no later then thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 8/14/2012. (Reference: All Cases)(gbw, )
July 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 759 ORDER denying 708 Sikorsky's MOTION for APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court and PHI's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Decision (Rec. Doc. 709 ) are hereby OVERRULED. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 7/10/12. (Reference: 09-3144)(sek, )
December 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 704 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 598 Motion for Sanctions. PHI's request for monetary sanctions, related to PHI's settlement agreement and payment is DENIED; PHI is GRANTED costs and attorneys' fees as stated within docume nt. FURTHER ORDERED that PHI shall file motions to fix attorney's fees into the record by 12/21/2011. Any opposition to the fee application shall be filed no later than 12/30/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (Reference: 09-3144)(gec, )
June 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 512 ORDER & REASONS denying 491 Defendant PHI Inc's Motion to Disqualify Expert. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 6/8/11. (Reference: 09-3144 & 09-4197)(sek, )
April 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 488 ORDER AND REASONS denying 454 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 4/18/2011. (Reference: 09-3144)(mmm, )
January 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 437 Minute Order. Status Conference held on 1/5/2011 before Judge Carl Barbier: granting 411 Motion to Continue Trial; denying 418 Motion to Dismiss Case; denying 419 Motion to Dismiss Case; granting 432 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdictio n. A suggested protocol for preservation and testing of aircraft records will be filed by Defendants by 1/20/2011; Plaintiffs will file response on week thereafter. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/6/2011 02:00 PM before Judge Carl Barbier. Ju ry Selection set for 10/31/2011 08:30AM before Judge Carl Barbier. Jury Trial set for 11/2/2011 08:30 AM before Judge Carl Barbier. A settlement conference will be set before the District Judge by separate order. (Court Reporter Cathy Pepper.) (Attachments: # 1 Attendance) (Reference: All Cases)(mmm, )
December 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 412 ORDER granting 314 Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.'s Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 410 PHI and National Union's Motion for Leave to amend their complaint to comply with Connecticut law. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 12/13/10. (sek, )
June 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 285 ORDER AND REASONS denying 241 Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice or Stay the Cross-Claim Filed by PHI, Inc. and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Louisiana. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 6/23/2010. (Reference: 09-3144)(mmm, )
March 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 238 ORDER AND REASONS denying 185 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 3/22/2010. (Reference: 09-3144)(mmm, )
March 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 234 ORDER AND REASONS denying 184 Motion to Dismiss the Cross Claim of PHI, Inc. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3). Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 3/1/2010. (Reference: 09-3144)(mmm, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yelton et al v. PHI, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelly Yelton
Represented By: Paul M. Sterbcow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven Yelton
Represented By: Paul M. Sterbcow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PHI, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aeronautical Accessories, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?