Yelton et al v. PHI, Inc. et al
Kelly Yelton and Steven Yelton |
PHI, Inc., Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation and Aeronautical Accessories, Inc |
2:2009cv03144 |
March 26, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Marine Office |
Out of State |
Carl Barbier |
Karen Wells Roby |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
00:0000 Cause Code Unknown |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 760 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 707 PHI Inc's Motion for Attorney Fees; FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation shall submit payment to Defendant PHI, Inc. in the amount of $577,206.50 no later then thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 8/14/2012. (Reference: All Cases)(gbw, ) |
Filing 759 ORDER denying 708 Sikorsky's MOTION for APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court and PHI's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Decision (Rec. Doc. 709 ) are hereby OVERRULED. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 7/10/12. (Reference: 09-3144)(sek, ) |
Filing 704 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 598 Motion for Sanctions. PHI's request for monetary sanctions, related to PHI's settlement agreement and payment is DENIED; PHI is GRANTED costs and attorneys' fees as stated within docume nt. FURTHER ORDERED that PHI shall file motions to fix attorney's fees into the record by 12/21/2011. Any opposition to the fee application shall be filed no later than 12/30/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (Reference: 09-3144)(gec, ) |
Filing 512 ORDER & REASONS denying 491 Defendant PHI Inc's Motion to Disqualify Expert. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 6/8/11. (Reference: 09-3144 & 09-4197)(sek, ) |
Filing 488 ORDER AND REASONS denying 454 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 4/18/2011. (Reference: 09-3144)(mmm, ) |
Filing 437 Minute Order. Status Conference held on 1/5/2011 before Judge Carl Barbier: granting 411 Motion to Continue Trial; denying 418 Motion to Dismiss Case; denying 419 Motion to Dismiss Case; granting 432 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdictio n. A suggested protocol for preservation and testing of aircraft records will be filed by Defendants by 1/20/2011; Plaintiffs will file response on week thereafter. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/6/2011 02:00 PM before Judge Carl Barbier. Ju ry Selection set for 10/31/2011 08:30AM before Judge Carl Barbier. Jury Trial set for 11/2/2011 08:30 AM before Judge Carl Barbier. A settlement conference will be set before the District Judge by separate order. (Court Reporter Cathy Pepper.) (Attachments: # 1 Attendance) (Reference: All Cases)(mmm, ) |
Filing 412 ORDER granting 314 Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.'s Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 410 PHI and National Union's Motion for Leave to amend their complaint to comply with Connecticut law. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 12/13/10. (sek, ) |
Filing 285 ORDER AND REASONS denying 241 Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice or Stay the Cross-Claim Filed by PHI, Inc. and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Louisiana. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 6/23/2010. (Reference: 09-3144)(mmm, ) |
Filing 238 ORDER AND REASONS denying 185 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 3/22/2010. (Reference: 09-3144)(mmm, ) |
Filing 234 ORDER AND REASONS denying 184 Motion to Dismiss the Cross Claim of PHI, Inc. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3). Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 3/1/2010. (Reference: 09-3144)(mmm, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.