Wilhelmus v. St. Bernard Parish
Plaintiff: Douglas Wilhelmus
Defendant: St. Bernard Parish
Case Number: 2:2009cv03644
Filed: May 22, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: New Orleans Office
County: St Bernard
Presiding Judge: Lance M Africk
Presiding Judge: Daniel E. Knowles
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER granting 34 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk. (car, )
July 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER denying 6 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk. (car, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilhelmus v. St. Bernard Parish
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Douglas Wilhelmus
Represented By: Wesley Joseph Levesque
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: St. Bernard Parish
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?