Mendy et al v. Omni Bancshare, Inc et al
| Charles Albert Mendy and Dominique Flicher Mendy |
| Omni Bancshare, Inc and Unidentified Party |
| 2:2009cv06286 |
| September 14, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Orleans |
| Mary Ann Vial Lemmon |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Plaintiff |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
126
ORDER AND REASONS denying 83 Motion for Extension of Deadlines, Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery, 83 Motion to Compel. Order granting 45 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and plaintiff's discrimination claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs' remaining state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon. (ecm, )
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER denying dft Omni Bank's 58 Motion to Expedite Hearing and denying dft Omni Bank's 57 Motion to Compel as set forth herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 6/22/2011. (rll, ) Modified on 6/23/2011 to edit doc type (rll, ).
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that dft's 51 Motion to Expedite Hearing on Motion to Quash is GRANTED; FURTHER ORDERED that dft's 50 Motion to Quash is GRANTED and pla's discovery requests are hereby QUASHED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 6/17/2011. (rll, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
