Gonzalez v. Seal et al
| Angelo A. Gonzalez |
| Ronnie Seal, B. V. Smith, Csm. Brook and Jonathan A. Tyres |
| 2:2009cv07707 |
| December 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Washington |
| Carl Barbier |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
ORDER AND REASONS denying 95 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 9/15/2011. (clm, )
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER AND REASONS. ORDERED that Defendants' 92 OBJECTION TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS be OVERRULED and that Defendants' 80 MOTION for Summary Judgment be DENIED. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier.(gec, )
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER denying 78 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 7/27/2011. (rll, ) Modified on 7/29/2011 to edit doc type (rll, ).
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER: The Motion to Informeaning (sic) and a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or a Preliminary Injunction with Order for Hearing (R. Doc. 39) are hereby DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 12/28/10. (bbc, )
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER ADOPTING PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 28 ; denying 21 MOTION for Prospective Declaratory Judgment. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 4/23/2010.(mmm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
