Moore v. Omega Protein Corporation et al
William Moore |
Omega Protein Corporation and Raccoon Point M/V |
2:2010cv00311 |
February 3, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
Vermilion |
Kurt D. Engelhardt |
Karen Wells Roby |
Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 117 ORDER and REASONS denying 115 Motion for Summary Judgment, as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 8/7/2014. (Reference: 10-311, 13-6448)(cbs) |
Filing 108 ORDER & REASONS denying 99 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 4/30/2014. (Reference: All Cases)(mmm) |
Filing 71 ORDER AND REASONS denying 68 Motion for New Trial. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 5/27/2011. (caa, ) |
Filing 50 ORDER and REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion in Limine and to Exclude Incorrect Statements of Law Concerning Future Economic Damages 35 is DENIED as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 1/4/2011. (cab) Modified on 1/4/2011 to edit document type (cab). |
Filing 41 ORDER and REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that, Plaintiff William Moore's Motion in Limine and to Exclude Evidence of Plaintiff's Prior Criminal Record 33 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 12/22/2010. (cab) Modified on 12/22/2010 to edit document type(cab). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.