Jefferson v. Orleans Criminal District Court et al
| Chris A. Jefferson |
| Orleans Criminal District Court |
| Attorney General State of Louisiana |
| 2:2010cv00782 |
| March 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Kurt D. Engelhardt |
| Sally Shushan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER and REASONS ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 17 . IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is adopted in part, and made the order of the Court in part. Specifically, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is adopted, and made the order of the Court, insofar as it recommends that two of Petitioner's three claims be denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, however, that the Respondent's objection is SUSTAINED with respect to the portions of the Report and Recommendati on directed to Petitioner's claim concerning the ten-year "cleansing period" applicable to his underlying felony manslaughter conviction pursuant to Louisiana Revised Statute 14:95.1(C). Accordingly, IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the petition for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner, Chris A. Jefferson, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 11/30/2011.(cab)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
