Hughes v. Louis Armstrong International Airport
Larry A Hughes |
Louis Armstrong International Airport |
2:2010cv00808 |
March 8, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
Carl Barbier |
Alma L. Chasez |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
00 U.S.C. ยง 0000 Cause Code Unknown |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER AND REASONS denying 36 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 4/18/2011. (Reference: 10-808)(mmm, ) |
Filing 34 ORDER granting 31 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 2/16/2011. (mmm, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hughes v. Louis Armstrong International Airport | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Larry A Hughes | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Louis Armstrong International Airport | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.