Bella et al v. Terrebonne Parish School Board et al
Tyrone Bella and Kathy Bella |
Carol Davis, M Torbert, J Martin, D Dillard, L. Vernon Bourgeois, Terrebonne Parish School Board, Martin Phillip, Michael Suggs, Unidentified Parties and Terrebonne Parish Sheriff's Office |
2:2011cv02614 |
October 17, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
Terrebonne |
Alma L. Chasez |
Kurt D. Engelhardt |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 68 ORDER and REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that, on or before October 25, 2012, Plaintiffs must move for entry of default against defendants Randy Rochel and Shantel Rochel, pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or show good cause in writing why their claims against these defendants should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute, as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 10/16/2012.(cab) |
Filing 64 ORDER AND REASONS granting 52 Motion for Summary Judgment, and dismissing Terrebonne Parish School Board, Martin Phillip, Carol Davis, M. Torbert, J. Martin, and D. Dillard. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 9/26/2012. (mmm) |
Filing 63 ORDER and REASONS granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Treating Expert Witnesses and/or Limit their Testimony, as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 9/17/2012. (cab) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.