Port of South Louisiana v. Tri-Parish Industries, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Port of South Louisiana
Defendant: Tri-Parish Industries, Inc., Tri-Parish Barge, Inc. and Charles L Augustine
Case Number: 2:2011cv03065
Filed: December 14, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: New Orleans Office
County: St Charles
Presiding Judge: Jane Triche Milazzo
Presiding Judge: Karen Wells Roby
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 170 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. For reasons set forth in document, all remaining claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendants. Signed by Judge Jane Triche Milazzo.(Reference: Both Cases)(ecm)
February 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 103 ORDER AND REASONS that the 44 Motion to Dismiss and for Partial Summary Judgment filed by TP Industries and Augustine is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The 71 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by TP Industries and Augustine is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. All claims against TP Industries and Augustine in his personal capacity are DISMISSED. The claims against Augustine in his capacity as an alleged 'alter ego' of TP Barge shall remain pending. The 79 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by TP Barge is DENIED. All claims against TP Barge shall remain pending. The 75 Motion to Dismiss or for Adverse Inference Due to Spoliation of Evidence filed by TP Industries and Augustine is DENIED AS MOOT. The 83 Motion to Dismiss or for Adverse Inference Due to Spoliation of Evidence filed by TP Barge and the 66 Motion for Sanctions filed by TP Industries and Augustine are DENIED. Signed by Judge Jane Triche Milazzo. (Reference: Both Cases)(ecm, )
May 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER and REASONS denying 4 Motion to Dismiss Case; denying 4 Motion for More Definite Statement; denying 6 Motion to Dismiss; denying 6 Motion for More Definite Statement. Signed by Judge Jane Triche Milazzo on 5/2/2012. (Reference: 11-3065, 12-433)(mm, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Port of South Louisiana v. Tri-Parish Industries, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Port of South Louisiana
Represented By: Catherine Leary
Represented By: Bruce Victor Schewe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tri-Parish Industries, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tri-Parish Barge, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles L Augustine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?